The Internet of Us

The Internet of Us

Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data

Book - 2016
Average Rating:
1
Rate this:
"While a wealth of literature has been devoted to life with the Internet, the deep philosophical implications of this seismic shift have not been properly explored ... Demonstrating that knowledge based on reason plays an essential role in society and that there is much more to 'knowing' than just acquiring information, ... philosopher Michael Patrick Lynch [posits that] our digital way of life makes us overvalue some ways of processing information over others, and thus risks distorting what it means to be human"--Dust jacket flap.
Publisher: New York, NY : Liveright Publishing Corporation, a division of W.W. Norton & Company, [2016]
Edition: First edition
Copyright Date: ©2016
ISBN: 9780871406613
0871406616
Characteristics: xviii, 237 pages ; 24 cm

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

t
tjdickey
Nov 13, 2017

Lynch is a professional philosopher, and a good one; "The Internet of Us" takes as its task to examine "the foundations of ... our digital life." His approach, well supported in ethics and neuroscience, is that the Internet - especially social media and the growing pervasiveness of cell phones and other connected objects (your car, your watch, your refrigerator, your thermostat) is changing the very way we as human beings know things. We replacing deeper levels of understanding with pervasive Google-knowing, and an un-examined hive mind.
The author does not say that the connected world is bad in itself, just as the automobile is not bad in itself. The automobile has made us preference itself over other ways of getting places - we use cars exclusively and unthinkingly, over public transportation and walking which are other ways of getting places with their own positive effects on us and on society. Similarly, a technologically connected world makes us preference quick and less-critical reception of snippet knowledge from the crowd (or worse, from the crowd of people who think like us and just re-tweet the same things), over our own rational acceptance of reasons for belief and knowledge.
He reiterates the good that can come from our connected lives, and that the UN has declared blocking access to the Internet a violation of human rights. However, he desperately wishes we all spent more time in rational and thoughtful discourse over the net.
Ironically, the very people whose digital attention spans are most affected by fragmentation and living on social media are the least likely to pay attention and read his arguments...

Age

Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at DPL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top